Tuesday, 30 October 2018

Do We Care?


I have been shocked (perhaps naively) by the recent acts of violence in the United States; specifically, first, the home-grown terrorism of the bombs mailed to prominent members of the Democratic Party as well as CNN personalities who Donald Trump repeated call “fake news”, and second, the mass murder at the Synagogue.    The suspects in each of these cases were apparently influenced by the statements of Donald Trump.   It is important to note that they are still suspects who are not guilty until they have due process.  However, it is undeniable that Donald Trump has done a great deal to increase the further divide in a much-divided country and has set groups of people against others.  I specifically say groups as much of what he says is categorizing people not as individuals but as classes and races and groups such as transgendered.

This morning I read a fascinating article which was posted by Lorna Harris on her Facebook wall.  As an aside, I finally discovered what the Facebook Wall is having heard people refer to it for years and not understanding it is just when you post something on your Facebook Page.  But I digress.  The article is entitled “Silence in the face of evil” by Alan Bean   and can be found at https://baptistnews.com/article/silence-in-the-face-of-evil-learning-from-an-obscure-schoolteacher-who-urged-karl-barth-and-other-theologians-to-stand-in-solidarity-with-the-jews-in-nazi-Germany/?fbclid=IwAR2Q0rSXvzH_BLsTwZ8vYE21DgNHO0CXotE03r84wOinuUnRk5qw4xWlVNQ#.W9ci3WhKiUn

The link is good summary of the subject and speaks of someone in pre-WW2 Germany, Elisabeth Schmitz, who encouraged Protestant leaders such as Martin Niemöller, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth to speak out directly against Hitler and Nazi actions before the war.  The author relates the silence of Protestant leaders in pre-war Germany to what is happening in the United States today and criticizes the religious leaders who support the President, “Trump is idolized by one-third of the American population because he never mentions these realities. In fact, he buries the guardians of memory under an avalanche of invective. The German Church never acknowledged her (the churches) complicity with the National Socialists, and the white churches of America are equally resistant to truth.” 

I am currently re-reading The Cry for Myth by Rollo May.  In his analysis of the classic novel, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and the myth behind it, he argues that the Fitzgerald was writing about the emptiness of the Jazz Age and that, “behind our loneliness was the lack of authentic caring.”  May notes that Fitzgerald uses the “careless” on almost every page of the novel.  He further holds that, “The word “care” should be taken in its literal meaning: the ability of people to have compassion, to communicate on deeper levels and to love each other…Tom and Daisy has no sense of mercy, which expresses care and usually can be counted on to mitigate human cruelty.” 
May holds that the central theme of the novel is loneliness.  Jay Gatsby was a “the proto-type of loneliness.”  He was a self-made person and, “like all self-made persons, he was cut off inwardly from and deep relationship.”  This, it seems to me, to be exactly what and who Donald Trump is.  He revels in the persona of the self-made man who achieved all he did himself with just a small million-dollar loan from his father which, of course, he repaid.  The recent revelation that he received inestimably more (as least monetarily) from his father belies that foundation of the Donald Trump myth. \

Trump is decidedly, in my mind, at base a lonely person who must who seeks continually to be complemented outrageously by those around him and to receive adulation by the adoring crowds at the endless rallies that have continually been held since his election. 

So, what is the response to what we see going on in the United States. First, we have to realize it is not just in the United States.  The seeds of what is being harvested there are here in Canada and in the world today.  We must base our response on love which is the foundation of caring; caring for others and for the world.  We are called as Christians to love our neighbours and, more to the point, to love our enemies as impossible as that seems.  To love someone does not mean to blindly accept whatever they say or do.  We must show the love of Christ in our prayers and actions; it is not enough to hold them in “our thoughts and prayers” as is so often the response by those in leadership in our countries.  Prayers must be followed by actions.  We need to speak out when laws are passed to divide rather than show caring for those who are on the margins of society such as the decision there will be no more safe injection sites in Ontario. 

We are each on a journey, as I sign off each of these musings.   We are each on a journey but we do not journey alone.  We are on a journey where it is possible to care for one another or to live out or a sense of loneliness and futility as Jay Gatsby did.  It is up to each of us what that journey will be.  

May it be blessed.

Monday, 22 October 2018

You’ve Got to Serve Somebody




Yesterday, the Gospel reading was the account of the disciples James and John, the Zebedee boys (as they were described by the preacher) asking Jesus for a favour.  They want Jesus, "to do for us whatever we ask.” Jesus certainly was not going to be taken in by that ploy i.e. answering an open request without knowing what was being asked of him.  In this case, it was a blatant request by the boys to have places of honour in God’s kingdom.

Here we have a great example of ego run a muck.  The Zebedee boys think that they should be in positions of honour when God’s kingdom is established.  After all, hadn’t they been his loyal disciples, ones in his inner circle.  Shouldn’t their loyalty and sacrifice be rewarded?  They had earned it.  They deserve it.  They wanted to get their just rewards.  And why not you might ask.
I have called the ego God’s greatest gift as well as man’s greatest challenge or perhaps curse.  The ego believes it is and should be in charge.  It naturally believes is the centre of its universe and will do just about anything to confirm and maintain that position.  

This desire for control and to be in charge has led to no end of trouble for human kind throughout history.  Of course, we could not be conscious beings who are aware of our place in the world and our relationship to all of God’s creation and to God without the ego.  So, it is not a question of eliminating the ego.  It is a question, as least for Christians, of knowing that the ego should serve God and not the other way around.

In effect, are we going to serve God or are we going to behave as if God and everything else should serve us.  If we try and have the world serve us things are going to go badly awry and we will serve other things and believe we are serving ourselves.   The song by Bob Dylan sums it up nicely:
You may be an ambassador to England or France
You may like to gamble, you might like to dance
You may be the heavyweight champion of the world

You may be a socialite with a long string of pearls
But you're gonna have to serve somebody, yes
Indeed you're gonna have to serve somebody
Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody

As Bob says, we’re going to have to serve somebody or some thing.  The choice is up to us.  It ain’t an easy choice (as I’m sure somebody must have sung sometime) but it is a choice thanks to free will. 

Blessings on you journey and on the choices you make.

Wednesday, 17 October 2018

The Forgiveness Challenge



The Globe and Mail this past Saturday published an opinion piece entitled Forgiveness is for Suckers.  A link to the article is https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-todays-forgiveness-culture-is-for-suckers/.  The article draws on the parable of the Prodigal Son to support the author’s position that forgiveness is a scam.  The closing sentence of the article states “Maybe the real message of the Prodigal Son story us that the pride of the show-off forgiver will always be served first.”  I am not sure in the authors mind whether the ‘forgiver’ is the Prodigal son who is forgiven or the father who does the forgiving.  It definitely isn’t the older brother.   

The article has many arguments and a conclusion that I disagree with whole heartedly.  First, the author RM Vaughan, does not appear to have read the actual parable or, if the author has, is deliberately blind to what it actually says.  He begins by stating the older brother stays home to look after this aging father.  There is nothing in the parable to suggest the father is old with the implication that perhaps he is going senile.  After all who would forgive the young foolish son except someone who is losing his mental faculties.  Indeed, the parable tells that, “But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion for him; he ran to his son, threw his arms around him and kissed him.”  Not the action of an elderly incapacitated man.  The author is very much on the side of the older son saying he, “never got so much as the occasional goat to slaughter.”  He could have added not even a goat much less ‘the fatted calf’ which the father did to celebrate the return of the son who was lost to him. 

The author leaves out the poignant reply by the father, “‘My son,’ the father said, ‘you are always with me, and everything I have is yours. 32 But we had to celebrate and be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’”  I read into this that the older son could have had a goat for a celebration if he had wanted one.  But perhaps he was too proud and had a bit of a martyr complex. However, that may be reading too much into the story.  Vaughan’s position is that the prodigal son got away with it.  He got his inheritance early and spent it on wine, woman and song and when he ran out of money he sobered up, picked himself up and gaily returned home to reclaim his previous life.  The father was a fool and worse to just blindly forgive the wastrel son.  However, as Jesus (the author of the story) tells us, the younger son repented, “I will set out and go back to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your hired servants.’ 20 So he got up and went to his father.”  He does just this when he is greeted by his father saying, “The son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’” 
There can be several ways of looking at this.  First, the father forgave the son regardless of his repentance.  The second way is that the father recognized that the son had repented by the very act of returning home.  Finally, the cynic could say that the prodigal son did this just as a ploy knowing his father would take him back and restore him to his old life if he showed repentance.  In any case, the father in the parable, who can represent our heavenly father, is forgiving when his son repents and turns around from his sinful ways.  This is very true for us as well. 

In my assessment of the essay, the author is, unfortunately viewing the issue of forgiveness through a lens that does not see the possibility of true forgiveness.  Vaughan see certain acts of coverup as forgiveness putting the sins of the Roman Catholic Church of moving pedophile priest to different parishes as acts of forgiveness rather than a way of protecting the institution which was more important that the protection of the members of the flock.  Vaughan makes the point that forgiveness is held up as a matter of simplistic shrug-it-off formulas and “by its very nature, forgiveness is an act of denial.”

I must agree with Vaughan that the church has made forgiveness seem to be an easy thing.  As Christians we are commanded to follow Christs example and forgive.  By implication all we have to do is the say the magic phrase, “I forgive”, and all is well; we forgive and forget.  As a result, this idea of easy forgiveness has entered our culture.  Forgiveness does not involve forgetting.  True forgiving does not come easily and will likely involve a lot of hard work which will move forward in fits and start.  However, the moving forward will free us from being held hostage by the events that we have experienced.

Vaughan makes the final point by quoting someone who sates that “There is nothing in the bible that says that forgiveness is good for the physical or mental health”.  That is probably true, but it is true that it is necessary for sour souls.  If we are unable to forgive we will have barriers to living fully in relationship with God.  We will be filled with anger and possibly hatred which is not a recipe for loving our neighbours much less our enemies.  If we do not forgive we will have a lens through which we will have a distorted view the world just as Vaughan perceived the Prodigal Son parable.

Blessings on you journey.




Friday, 12 October 2018

Going Home



Happy Thanksgiving to all the Canadians.  We Canadians like to get a jump on what is after all, the beginning of fall and begin preparations for the winter to come.

Last week we were traveling and have now settled in to our home in Parkhill closing down the (summer) home in Prince Edward Island.  Making that transition always encourages me to think about where and what home is.  I am reminded of a resident of L’Arche, Daybreak in New Market Ontario.  I visited L’Arche for a few day one reading week when I was studying theology at Huron College in London Ontario.  One of the residents always greeted people with the question, “where’s your home?”  When I was asked this, it set me back a bit because it was not the usual, “where do you live” or “where do you come from?”  It was unexpected and also, I wasn’t sure what the answer was.

Where is my home is not something that is easy to answer such as where do I live?  I live in Parkhill Ontario as well as Eglington PEI but I am not sure that either place is truly my home.  Perhaps the cottage is more of a home but I not sure about that.  If I consider what actually constitutes a home it is a place where I feel I belong and where I can be accepted for who I am.  I can fall back on the cliché, ‘home is where the heart is’.  It is a cliché but there is a kernel of truth as there is in every cliché.  What place resonates with my heart.  I felt I had found my church home when I was at my first real experience of Anglican worship many years ago after looking for a religious home.   I knew in my heart, if not in my head (at least initially) that this was where I belonged.

There is also the sense of going or returning home when I have shuffled off this mortal coil.  I was listening to a program about a resident for aging convicts who were who were on parole after being imprisoned for many years.  The founder of the facility, who gave more than might be expected of anyone to people such as these, did everything possible to make the place a home for them and was able to comfort many who were actively dying by assuring them that they were going to their eternal home.  That is the sense that is captured wonderfully in the spiritual Going Home.  It is often thought of as a traditional “negro” spiritual.  However, it is actually a relatively modern addition to the genre with a student of the famous composer, Anton Dvorak who put lyrics to the Dvorak music.  The following link is a good rendition of the haunting song, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ_2Xbvb0rQ.

The lyrics sum up, I believe the essence of what home is:
Goin' home, goin' home, I'm a goin' home;
Quiet-like, some still day, I'm jes' goin' home.
It's not far, jes' close by,
Through an open door;
Work all done, care laid by,
Goin' to fear no more.
Mother's there 'spectin' me,
Father's waitin' too;
Lots o' folk gather'd there,
All the friends I knew,
All the friends I knew.
Home, I'm goin' home!

Nothin lost, all's gain,
No more fret nor pain,
No more stumblin' on the way,
No more longin' for the day,
Goin' to roam no more!
Mornin' star lights the way,
Res'less dream all done;
Shadows gone, break o' day,
Real life jes' begun.
There's no break, there's no end,
Jes' a livin' on;
Wide awake, with a smile
Goin' on and on.

Goin' home, goin' home, I'm jes' goin' home,
goin' home, goin' home, goin' home!

The idea of home has come up a number of times in the last few days in things that I have been reading and listening to, which is not surprizing this seems to happen quite frequently.  I will close with one quote which is from The Cry for Myth by Rollo May:
The presence of a home, a place where one is listened to, where one can feel “at home,” is essential to healthy myth.  Many of our patients in therapy find that their neurotic problems are related to their never having had a home where they were listened to.
Blessing on your journey home.