The subject of my sermon on Sunday was the sign of the covenant
between God and the People of God. The
Old Testament reading pointed to the sign of the original covenant between
Abraham and God as circumcision of every male, “Every male among you shall be
circumcised. You shall circumcise the
flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and
you”. The appointed reading actually
skipped over that part of the passage. Perhaps
the men who developed the Revised Common Lectionary thought the congregations would
not be comfortable hearing about the details of circumcision. It does sometimes make men uncomfortable.
In any case, circumcision was the sign of the covenant
between God and the descendants of Abraham and continues to be the sign of the covenant
for the Jewish people. It no longer
represents that for Christians. With
Jesus as our saviour, we have a new covenant which does not have circumcision
as a sign of the covenant between God and us.
We have the Eucharist which is a re-membering of the sacrifice of Jesus
as our sign of that new covenant.
However, Paul proposed, or I should say proclaimed, that
with Jesus Christ with have a new circumcision. As a good Jew and a Pharisee,
he knew that circumcision was vital to the Jewish people who he believed should
recognized Jesus as their long-awaited Messiah.
He also knew that if Gentiles were to be welcomed as followers of Jesus
Christ, they would need a new sign to replace circumcision. He addresses this
in his letter to the Romans; circumcision as an initiation right would certainly
have discouraged some prospective members:
Rather,
a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the
heart—it is spiritual and not literal. Such a person receives praise not from
others but from God. (Romans 2:29)
Paul is
speaking of circumcision of the heart.
In effect it is a spiritual sign rather than a literal sign of the new
covenant between God and God’s people.
It is unfortunate that this has not become a more prevalent symbol in
Christianity today. It is spoke of in
some parts of our religion but it is not as prevalent as many symbols. The heart if a very powerful symbol which
does resonate as a symbol of love even in our scientific materialistic world
today.
The heart
traditionally represented the feeling world of human existence at the deepest
level and going back to ancient times.
Indeed, as noted by theologian Marcus Borg:
the heart in biblical tradition is an
image of the elf at its deepest level.
For the ancient Hebrews, the heart was not simply associated with
feelings or courage or courage or love, as in common usage. Rather, the heart was associated with the
totality of the human psyche: not only emotion but also intellect, volition,
and even perception”. (The God We Never Knew 113)
So, when
Paul speaks of circumcision as a matter of the heart, he is bringing a depth of
meaning to his call for people to begin a new relationship with God. It is a relationship which is not focussed on
being praised by other. He is calling us
to do those things which are pleasing to God.
We all know
what it means to be hard-hearted. We
probably know someone or perhaps more than one person who we consider
hard-hearted. We know how that person
behaves towards others.
Indeed, the
news is full of examples of how people behave when they are hard-hearted. Hard-hearted people do not let their feeling
and emotions get in the way of how they behave towards others. They do not show others compassion and
believe that people should not be given a second or even a third chance when
they don’t live up to the expectations they have for others. They certainly don’t believe in forgiveness
despite what Jesus says about forgiving someone seventy times seven. If they forgive someone that person must earn
their forgiveness and meet their terms which are probably very strict. They are people who believe that the
consequences of offenses should be retributive and they don’t really believe in
punishment that is redemptive. They are
in support of mandatory minimum sentences for crimes.
Well what is
the opposite of being hard-hearted? Of
course, it is being soft-hearted which doesn’t always get very good press. Being soft-hearted has the connotation of
being a push over, of being an easy mark, of being taken advantage of.
I proposed
that a better way of conceiving of the opposite of heard-hearted is being
open-hearted. This is Jesus’ message in
the beatitudes. He doesn’t speak
specifically of being open-hearted but for me that is behind much of the what
Jesus is speaking of when he talks of righteousness and mercy and the pure of
heart.
I try not to
be hard-hearted. I make an effort to be open-hearted;
I try but God knows I do not always succeed.
So, there is
a great deal packed into that short statement by Paul―real circumcision is a
matter of the heart. This Lent I invite
you to practice a heart that is open.