Sunday was officially The Sunday of the Passion
with the Liturgy of the Palms in the Church Year . The events
of the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem to the adulation of the crowd waving
palm branches and crying Hosanna in the highest were contrasted with the events
of Good Friday and the passion of Jesus’ trial and crucifixion.
When I was growing up, I can remember that these two events
were ‘celebrated’ on different days. Palm
Sunday recounted the entry into Jerusalem and the passion of Christ was marked
on Good Friday – which it still is today.
I attended the United Church of Canada in the first part of my life and
in my memory, Palm Sunday was reserved to mark the events of the entry into Jerusalem. When I started attending an Anglican Church at
the mid-point in my life – as I measure it at this point – I was surprized that
the two events of Palm Sunday and the Passion were celebrated together and then
the Passion was marked on Good Friday – where, to my mind, it rightly belongs.
I must confess that, in the years that followed which
included my formal theological training, I did not explore, what seemed to me, a
strange convergence of the two Gospel narratives. The issue was never addressed and I also did
not raise it. However, I have always
thought that it made more sense to keep them separate as I had experienced it
in my earlier life. Well, with circumstances
being what they are this year i.e. churches being closed due to the COVID -19
pandemic and with us being thrown on our own devices for worship albeit with
lots of material available on-line and other places – ironically there is an embarrassment
of riches in this context - I decided to
make the best of the opportunity and investigate how this came about in the current
liturgy of our church.
It says in scripture, seek and you shall find, knock and the
door shall be opened, I sought and knocked on Google’s door and it did
open. I came across an article from the United
Methodist Church in the United States which addressed this issue. The author is
not named but it is under the publication Discipleship Ministries https://www.umcdiscipleship.org/resources/why-palmpassion-sunday-and-not-just-palm-sunday. The author
notes that he or she was one of the representatives of their denomination that
was involved with the change which came about with the development of the Revised
Common Lectionary (RCL) which is used today in most churches. The article puts to rest the rather common
belief that this change was made so that church goers who perhaps were lax in
their attendance on Good Friday worship services would hear the Passion story. The reader is assured that this was not the
case. Rather, it was to address the perceived
need to re-establish the dual event as a connection between Lent and Holy Week:
As a result of all this work by all these Christians,
worldwide, over all this time, we are where we are now -- with a recovered
Palm/Passion Sunday as the hinge between a recovered Lent and a more intense
Holy Week.
Behind this was the goal of re-establishing
and addressing the need to strengthening the discipleship of the followers of
Jesus Christ by building on the Lenten observances and the foundational events
of Holy Week:
The recovery of Lent was not simply about re-syncing our
current calendars with more ancient ones. Instead, it was primarily about
recovering the church's mission of discipling people in the way of Jesus,
and realigning our worship practices to support that mission.
These are very lofty goals;
however, I believe that something vital has been lost as a result. By binding the two events inexorably together
it does not enable the worshiper to experience the full impact and importance
of the events of that triumphal entry of Jesus who was fulfilling the scriptural
role of Messiah or king riding on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9). We need to have the full effect of being one
of the crowed massed along the route hoping against hope that here is the long-awaited
saviour who will address all the wrongs we have suffered in our lives. Here is the anointed one who will make right
all the wrongs in our lives and magically give us a new creation, a New Jerusalem.
Unless we have that experience
as fully as possible, we will not have the full impact of being one of the masses
that will turn on that failed saviour with the rage of our disappointment when those
unrealistic expectations are unfulfilled.
We will never have at least a taste of the experience being part of the crowd
that cries “crucify him”.
If we are honest with
ourselves will we admit that each of us would be with that crowd; or perhaps we
would “only” be with Peter and would deny knowing him when push come to shove.
Blessings on your journey this
Holy Week.
No comments:
Post a Comment