Those who read my weekly musings are likely aware that I often refer to the work of Richard Rohr. I find his theology and understanding of God and Christianity to be a sound guide which helps me navigate the waters of spiritual life and the cultural times we find ourselves in. Last week a friend brought to my attention a blog by a Christian writer, Alisa Childers, who is strongly opposite to the Christianity expressed in Richard Rohr’s writings. The blog may be found at https://www.alisachilders.com/blog/heres-why-christians-should-avoid-the-teachings-of-richard-rohr in case you wish to read it.
Let me delve into her
argument with Richard Rohr as expressed in that blog and give you a taste of
what she believes and why she is adamantly opposed to Rohr’s theology.
Childers firmly places herself in the type of Christianity which can be called
a fundamentalist. She declares, “Following Jesus’ own example, Christians
have affirmed over the centuries that the Scriptures are internally coherent,
without error, and infallible.” I would have to question whether Jesus held
this comprehensive view of scripture as I don’t believe that the Gospels give
evidence of that. She quotes Rohr to support her assessment of Rohr’s
understanding of scripture:
The text moves inexorably toward inclusivity, mercy, unconditional love,
and forgiveness. I call it the “Jesus Hermeneutic.” Just interpret
Scripture the way Jesus did! He ignores, denies, or openly opposes his own Scriptures
whenever they are imperialistic, punitive, exclusionary, or tribal.
Childers does not
identify the source of this quote so I don’t know the context in which it is
made. However, there are times when Jesus certainly objected to the
interpretation of scripture and the Law which Pharisees and others were making
e.g., the Sabbath is made for man and not man for the Sabbath. I am sure
that Rohr agree with Childers’s assertion that Rohr does not believe that
scripture is “internally coherent, without error, and infallible.”
My understanding of
scripture is that it is inspired by God. However, it is also revealed to
human beings. That revelation is understood by those who receive it in
different ways and through the prism of the limitations that all humans are
subject to. Humans in biblical times had an understanding of creation
through the limitations of their knowledge at that time. Therefore, they
did not know that the earth revolved around the sun and they believed that
heaven was somewhere up in the sky. They did not necessarily understand
that what they were receiving in revelation was being expressed symbolically
and the language of God is not necessarily understood in the way we perceive
it. I want to delve into this more fully next time. However, let me
close with another quote from Rohr in a recent Daily Meditation:
In my experience, the people who find God are usually people who are
very serious about their quest and their questions, more so than being
absolutely certain about their answers. I offer that as
hard-won wisdom.
I believe that those
who believe they know the mind of God with absolute certainty are guilty of the
sin of hubris. Indeed, perhaps God is discovered more in the questions
than in the answers.
Blessings on your journey
and blessings on your questions in your quest.
No comments:
Post a Comment