Showing posts with label Sodom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sodom. Show all posts

Monday, 28 January 2013

Reading the Bible 9: Gen 19: 1-29


Reading the Bible 9: Gen 19: 1-29
Lots of material here (pun intended) so I am reading chapter 19 in two parts.  There is more than one theme in this passage.  We have the theme of family values which was introduced earlier.  It is interesting that Lot offers the men from Sodom his two daughters ‘who have not known a man’ as a way to save the visitors from the abuse of the crowd.  I find it interesting that there has been little said in relation to the story of Sodom about the potential sacrifice of the young women by their father.  Not a good example of family values.  In addition there is nothing in the account to reflect how Lot felt about his wife being turned into a pillar of salt for the heinous crime of looking back as they fled the destruction of Sodom.  In my view these are not models for how a family should live according to biblical values. 

The other theme is hospitality which was addressed Reading the Bible 8.  Hospitality seems to be a much more important value in biblical times than it is perceived to be today.  Abraham certainly set the standard for hospitality in his welcoming the messengers (angels) from God who affirm the covenant between Abraham and God.  Lack of hospitality is also seen in some circles as the sin for which Sodom was destroyed rather than the usual one which is derived from the name of the city.  Jesus addresses this in the account in Matt: 10: 14-15 where Jesus is sending out the disciples as apostles.  He expects that they will not be received hospitably in some places. 
Matthew 10:14  And if anyone will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet when you leave that house or town. 15 Truly, I say to you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah than for that town.

The challenge for us today is to determine what it means for us to show hospitality to others.  How are Christians to be hospitable in a secular, multi-cultural society?  It is not a time for evangelism in the traditional sense.  The hospitality of evangelism could be a very interesting value to explore for fully another time and place.

Friday, 25 January 2013


Reading the Bible 8: Gen 18
The theme of hospitality runs through this passage.  Abraham is the epitome of the good host to the three ‘men’ who appear before him.  He is exemplary in his welcome offering them water to wash their feet and having the fatted calf killed to serve them.  (I wonder if Jesus was thinking of this when he told the parable of the Prodigal son?).  There is also a question in my mind whether he would have been as good a host if these were just ordinary men and not emissaries (angels) from God?

In any case there is certainly nothing that he can be faulted for in the hospitality department.  However, the other feature of this passage – putting aside the miracle of Sarah’s destiny of bearing a child in her old age – is Abraham’s bargaining with God.  It is human nature to bargain with God – If you will do this for me God – won’t you give me a Mercedes Benz as Janice Joplin prayed – then I will worship you or I will be happy or I will follow your commandments.  This relationship to God is correctly, I believe, not encouraged (despite the Prayer of Jabez phenomenon of a few years ago).  It is not the basis for a mature spirituality.   

However, I believe that Abraham’s bargaining on behalf of the inhabitants Sodom is different precisely because it is on behalf of other and not for his benefit.  So Abraham bargains the salvation of Sodom from fifty righteous people down to ten.  However, even that is not few enough as we know from the account in the next chapter Sodom’s fate. 
However, it is a compelling question.  Can we bargain with God and to what end.  Can we really bargain for ourselves or more righteously for others?  Was there a cosmic bargain between God and his only begotten son to bring salvation to humankind.  I have always had problems with this interpretation of Easter.  But that is for another reading.