It strikes me that the writer(s) of this part of Genesis protesteth
too much. They are attempting to assert
a claim on the burial land for Sarah in the land of the Hittites. They want the reader to be clear that there
is no question that Abraham obtained the land legally and paid a fair price for
it beyond any doubt. Therefore his
descendants have a perfect right to the land in question which might be in
dispute when the events were recorded. For
me this has reverberations for the present situation in Israel and the West
Bank and the settlers encroach in lands beyond what can be legally claimed by Israel. The settlements are like the camel’s nose in
the tent and the settlements are attempting to become so entrenched that they
will be no possible negotiation around removing them. The last verse of the chapter v20 puts the
seal on the situation, “The field and the cave that is in it passed from the
Hittites into Abraham’s possession as a burying place”.
The situation of Abraham seems to reflect what has gone on
in history. As he states he is ‘a
stranger and an alien’ residing among the Hittites and they treat him with every
hospitality and consent to allow him to have land as a burial site for
Sarah. How is that hospitality repaid by
Abraham and his descendants? In a
similar way the Europeans (my ancestors) came to North America and poked their
noses in the tent of North America and we know what happened after that. It was not Terra Nullius as was proclaimed by
we Europeans and we have been dealing with the consequences of broken treaties
and cultural assimilation to this day with the idle no more protests. History is written by the winners and it does
depend on whose ox is being gored and who land is being occupied. So the question remains what is a Christian
who is a descendent of those Europeans and who has indirectly at least
benefitted by the camel’s nose of those ancestors to do? No easy answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment